Web Page HTML/CSS Template
Webstyle produced NavBar
 
Twitter & Facebook
 INTER-NETWORKING
 
 
    LINK CATEGORIES
   *International
   Arts & Culture
   Business & Internet
   Education & Training
   Government & Politics
   Health
   Online Resources
   Organisations
   People & Society
    RELEVANT LINKS
 
 
   
 
  View NEWS
 2010-02-12 02:49 am Back to NEWS
Chiluba loses London Judgment application appeal at the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has dismissed an application by second republican president Fredrick Chiluba on preliminary issues raised against an application to register a London judgment, which found the former president liable in a civil case three years ago.

Dr Chiluba and his co-defendants former Access Financial Services Directors Faustin Kabwe and Aaron Chungu were held liable by UK High Court Judge Peter Smith for causing the Zambian Government the loss US$46 Million in public funds.

Delivering judgment in the matter Deputy Chief Justice Irene Mambilima sitting with other Supreme Court Judges ruled that there was no merit in the application by Dr Chiluba.

Justice Mambilima ruled that the lower court exercised its discretion to refuse to look at the preliminary matter as that would have wasted time because the issues that the defence raised could have been heard in the main matter. She further ruled that the case goes back to the High Court for determination.

On June 13, 2007 the Zambian Government obtained an ex parte order for leave to register and enforce the London Court judgment based on provisions of the Foreign Judgment Act Chapter 76 of the laws of Zambia.

But Dr Chiluba and his co-defendants former Access Financial Services (AFS) directors Faustin Kabwe and Aaron Chungu applied to set aside the registration based on seven grounds.

Some of the grounds upon which Dr Chiluba and his co-defendants based their arguments were that the London High Court has no jurisdiction over them, that the London judgment was obtained by fraud and that they were denied fair trial by the LondonHigh Court hence judgment was obtained without giving them an opportunity to be heard.

........................................................................................................................

Related News:


 
    MEMBER OPTIONS
 
Username
Password
Member Signup
Forgot Password
 
 
    SPONSORED LINKS
 
 
   
 DIRECTORY HOME
MEMBER LOGIN · EDITOR LOGIN · MEMBER SIGNUP · EDITOR SIGNUP
NEW LINKS · POPULAR LINKS · LINK TO US · ADD A LINK · NEWS
TERMS OF USE · PRIVACY POLICY · LEGAL POLICY · CONTACT US